Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Contemporary philosophy and the humanities are dominated by reductionist paradigms of corporeality that interpret the body either as a mechanistic object (the Cartesian-biomedical tradition) or as a passive surface text for the inscription of power (post-structuralism). Despite their differences, both approaches view the body as an isolated object, ignoring its constitutive relational nature. This leads to a theoretical impasse in the face of modern crises of identity, alienation, and the loss of connection, exacerbated by the dynamics of globalized and digital culture, which give rise to the phenomenon of the “capsular human”. This study aims to propose and substantiate an alternative, non-reductionist model of “spherical corporeality” based on Peter Sloterdijk's philosophy of spheres, capable of filling the existing research gap. The research results include a systematic reconstruction of the evolution of corporeality in the “Spheres” trilogy. As a result, a holistic theoretical model was developed, demonstrating the transformation of the body from a “hybrid vessel” in the microsphere, through a “target of media” in the macrosphere, to an “isolated capsule” in the foam of postmodernity. The model proves that the body is fundamentally a relational phenomenon, constituted within shared spaces of being.
The findings and the proposed model provide the academic community with a new conceptual apparatus to overcome the limitations of individualistic paradigms. They allow for describing the unity of intimate experience and global processes within a single evolutionary framework, creating a foundation for interdisciplinary research in philosophy, sociology, and cultural studies. The article is intended for specialists in these fields.
References
Bluemink, M. (2021). Foam Cities: Peter Sloterdijk’s Atmospheric Philosophy. Academia Letters, 2. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL2814
Gavrilenko, S. M. (2020). The cartographic dispositive (a few remarks on Peter Sloterdijk's "globes"). Praksema. Problemy vizual'noi semiotiki, 2(24), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2020-2-131-150 (In Russian).
Erofeeva, M. (2017). Actor-network theory: Object-oriented sociology without objects? Logos, 27(3), 83–112. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-3-83-109 (In Russian).
Latour, B. (2013). Spheres and networks: Two ways to reinterpret globalization. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 2, 5–16. (In Russian).
Latour, B. (2014). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (I. Polonskaya, Trans.; S. Gavrilenko, Ed.). Izdatel'skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. (In Russian).
Latour, B. (2017). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications, plus more than a few complications. Logos, 27(1), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-1-173-197 (In Russian).
Latour, B. (2008). A cautious Prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design. In “Networks of Design”, Annual International Conference of the Design History Society (pp. 151-165). Universal Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048514502.009
Lucci, A. (2022). The Limits of the Spheres: Otherness and solipsism in Peter Sloterdijk's philosophy. In Sloterdijk’s Anthropotechnics (pp. 92–108). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003258858-9
Lucci, A. (2023). Peter Sloterdijk and Bruno Latour. Notes on a ‘Star Friendship’. SOFT POWER, Revista Euro-Americana de Teoría e Historia de la Política, 10(1), 55–71.
Markov, A. V., & Sosnovskaya, A. M. (2025). The Hermitage as an interface of the "national identity" object. The Bulletin of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy, 26(3), 200–215. http://doi.org/10.25991/VRHGA.2025.4.4.040 (In Russian).
Markov, A. V., & Shtayn, O. A. (2024). Mascot between the real and digital world. The Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts, 5(121), 27–34. http://doi.org/10.24412/1997-0803-2024-5121-27-34 (In Russian).
Markov, A. V., & Shtayn, O. A. (2025). Neural network images and the violence of the gaze according to Dietmar Kamper. RGGU Bulletin. Series "Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies", 1, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-1-101-110 (In Russian).
Makarov, A. I., & Toropova, A. A. (2016). Alienated bodies: The interpretation of the concept of corporeality in postmodernism. Logos et Praxis, 15(4), 16–26. (In Russian).
Barros, M. F. de, Pavanini, M., & Lemmens, P. (2023). Peter Sloterdijk’s Philosophy of Technology: From Anthropogenesis to the Anthropocene. Technophany: A Journal for Philosophy and Technology, 1(2), 84–123. https://doi.org/10.54195/technophany.13602
Mannoni, O. (2025). Reconstitutions. Peter Sloterdijk, from one language to another, from one world to another. Appareil, 29. https://doi.org/10.4000/155ez (In French).
Morin, M.-È. (2025). Living Together in a Globalized World: Peter Sloterdijk's Global Foams and Bruno Latour's Cosmopolitics. Appareil, 29. https://doi.org/10.4000/155f1 (In French).
Ocheretyany, K. A. (2014). Urban corporeality: Parameters of the medial configuration. Logos et Praxis, 3, 138–147. (In Russian).
Ocheretyany, K. A. (2015). Photographic corporeality as corporeality with zero denotation. Studia Culturae, 23, 166–176. (In Russian).
Ocheretyany, K. A. (2018). Speculation in digital: The iconosophy of Evgeny Trubetskoy in the coordinates of media reality. International Journal of Cultural Research, 3(32), 148–162. (In Russian).
Ocheretyany, K. A. (2024). "Crystal bodies" of Leonardo da Vinci: Towards an epistemology of speculative interfaces of the Renaissance. Corpus Mundi, 5(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.46539/cmj.v5i1.90 (In Russian).
Sivkov, D. Yu. (2014). Immunity in stone: The architectural theory of Peter Sloterdijk. Sociology of Power, 2, 39–55. (In Russian).
Sloterdijk, P. (2005). Spheres: Microspherology. Vol. I: Bubbles. Nauka. (In Russian).
Sloterdijk, P. (2007). Spheres: Macrospherology. Vol. II: Globes. Nauka. (In Russian).
Sloterdijk, P. (2010). Spheres: Plural Spherology. Vol. III: Foam. Nauka. (In Russian).
Sloterdijk, P., & Heinrichs, H.-J. (2015). The Sun and Death: Dialogical Investigations. Izdatel'stvo Ivana Limbakha. (In Russian).
Sosnovskaya, A. M. (2023). The problem of applying the actor-network theory method in media theory and media communication. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 5(4), 282–304. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v5i4.435 (In Russian).
Sosnovskaya, A. M. (2024). The sequence of youth identity construction in media texts: Development and adaptation of actor-network theory for empirical media research (case analysis). Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 6(3), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i3.481 (In Russian).
Toropova, A. A. (2016). The artist's spherology: Body and territory. In The Genius Loci in Russian Art of the 20th Century. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference (pp. 38–42). Panorama.
(In Russian).
Toropova, A. A. (2020a). Agender aesthetics: Body is not an image, but a fluid. Corpus Mundi, 1(2), 37‑61. https://doi.org/10.46539/cmj.v1i2.11 (In Russian).
Toropova, A. A. (2020b). The European project of constructing new corporeality: Mutant body, body‑without-organs, agender body. Philosophy and Culture, 1, 54–62. (In Russian).
Toropova, A. A. (2024). Posthuman corporeality: Rethinking human nature. Logos et Praxis, 23(3), 91‑96. https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2024.3.12 (In Russian).
Shtayn, O. A. (2010a). The body in the world of media technologies. Mediaphilosophy, 5, 187–194. (In Russian).
Shtayn, O. A. (2010b). The transformation of corporeality in the modern world. The Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series “Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy”, 1, 99–102. (In Russian).
Shtayn, O. A. (2025). Autocommunication and puppet theater: Towards a psychology of shame and modesty in art. Artikul't, 2(58), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.28995/2227-6165-2025-2-84-99 (In Russian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.