Abstract
This article explores how humans are developing the digital environment by representing wildlife, and animals in particular, within its space. It explores contemporary environmental discourse, which is acquiring a virtual dimension, and projects aimed at integrating nature and technology. The text analyzes approaches to the problem of animal representation, presented in the works of contemporary authors, philosophers and natural researchers, such as John Berger, Tatyana Goricheva, Oksana Timofeeva, Alexander Pshera and others. The phenomenon of “animal extinction”, their marginalization and exploitation in the context of contemporary culture is explored, and possible ways to overcome this crisis are outlined. The author analyzes the trend associated with the development of contemplative, imaginative practices in the context of digital ecology and determines their role in the formation of an ethical approach to animals.
The main hypothesis of the article is that by representing the animal's corporeality in the modern digital space, humans strive to create and develop not only a digital, but primarily a living environment. At the same time, the formation of a digital image of an animal can also influence its own corporeality, blurring and changing its previous boundaries of life and ways of existence; this tendency contains existential risks. Taking this into account, it becomes clear that environmental ethics in its modern invariants becomes possible and is developed in those projects and practices in which the existential status of the animal is preserved.
References
Arendt, H. (2017). Vita Activa, or On the Active Life. Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
Berger J. (2020). The Art of Seeing. Cloudberry. (In Russian).
Berger, J. (2024) Why Look at Animals. Ad Marginem. (In Russian).
Collee, L. (2023). Ugly Cats and the Loneliness of Man. Los Angeles Review of Books. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/ugly-cats-and-the-loneliness-of-man
Goricheva, T. (2008). The Silence of Animals. Samizdat. (In Russian).
Heidegger, M. (1993). Question about technology. In Time and being: articles and speeches (pp. 221‑238). Republic. (In Russian).
Jünger, E. (2021). Glass Bees. AST. (In Russian).
Lippit, A. M. (2000). Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife. University of Minnesota Press.
Marris, E. (2011). Rambunctious Garden. Nature in a Post Wild Word. New York.
Morton, T. (2019). Going Green. Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
Morton, T. (2007). Ecology Without Nature. Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge/Mass.
Muybridge, E. (1902). Animals in motion: an electro-photographic investigation of consecutive phases of animal progressive movements. Chapman & Hall. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.158724
Mukhina, S. (2025) Interface as a Practice of the Self, or What Does It Mean to Be Alive in the Age of Cyborgs? Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 7 (2), 146-165. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v7i2.648 (In Russian).
Ocheretyany, K. (2024). Animal Interface: Digital Design Beyond the Human. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 6 (4), 59-83. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i4.582 (In Russian).
Pshera, A. (2017). The Internet of Animals: A New Dialogue Between Humans and Nature. Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
Timofeeva, O. (2025). History of Animals. New Literary Review. (In Russian).
Thoreau, G. (1962). Walden, or Life in the Woods. Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

