Schopenhauer and Beckett: Trauma of Modernity and Comedy of Incarnation
pdf (Русский)

Abstract views: 46
PDF Downloads: 20

Keywords

cultural trauma
subject
object
dualism
corporeality
modern
nihilism
comedy
Schopenhauer
Beckett

How to Cite

Sidorov, A. (2020). Schopenhauer and Beckett: Trauma of Modernity and Comedy of Incarnation. Corpus Mundi, 1(4), 34-55. https://doi.org/10.46539/cmj.v1i4.31

Abstract

The culture of modernity grows out of the traumatic experience of “European nihilism” and “the death of God,” i.e. the break with tradition and the collapse of a universal ontological and social order. One of the manifestations of the cultural trauma of modernity was the emergence of subject-object dualism, as a result of which the disembodied human subject was opposed to the impersonal and unconscious material world, which includes his own body. The problem of nihilism as a trauma of the crisis of meanings has been solved, since the era of romanticism, in a series of attempts to overcome the anxiety of the emptiness of the formal autonomy of the subject and to understand the paradoxes of incarnation. The aim of the article is to analyze the problem of corporeality in the context of the new European subject-object dualism in the work of S. Beckett, as well as in the philosophy of A. Schopenhauer, which had a decisive influence on Beckett. As a result of the research, a special way of working out the new European trauma of disembodiment was formulated, which consists not in a conservative striving to restore what has been destroyed and not in a revolutionary overcoming, but in an aporetic, deconstructive experience of undecidability and hesitation on the border of the subject-object split, which allows maintaining the "promise of happiness" and hope for redemption without shying away from the experience of disillusionment inherent in modernity and maintaining a presence of mind in the comedy of incarnation. The philosophical and artistic understanding of the problem of corporeality in the works of Schopenhauer and Beckett is one of the essential answers to the modern crisis of the foundations of life.

https://doi.org/10.46539/cmj.v1i4.31
pdf (Русский)

References

Adorno, T.W. (2003). Negative Dialectics. Moscow: Scientific world. (In Russian).

Bakhtin, M.M. (1990). Oeuvre of Francois Rabelais and Folk Culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Moscow: Imaginative Literature. (In Russian).

Beckett, S (2006). Murphy. Moscow: Text. (In Russian).

Beckett, S. (2010). Dream of Fair to Middling Women. Moscow: Text (in Russian).

Beckett, S. (1994). Trilogy. St. Petersburg: Chernyshev Publishing House.

Berman, M. (2020). Everything That is Solid Melts into Air. The Experience of Modernity. Moscow: Horizontal. (In Russian)

Comay, R. (2013). Tabula Rasa: David’s «Death of Marat» and the Trauma of Modernity. In Impossible Time: Past and Future in the Philosophy of Religion. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Critchley, S. (2004). Very little… Almost nothing. Death, Philosophy, Literature. London, New York: Routledge.

Datta, V.K. (2018). Trauma of Modernity in Wordsworth's Tintern Abbey. In International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences. 3(5), 796-801

Descartes, R. (1989). Discourse on the Method. In Writings in two volumes. T. 1. Moscow: Thought. (In Russian).

Deleuze, J. (2011). Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. St. Petersburg: Machina.

Eagleton, T. (2004). The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell.

Jung, K.-G. (2010). The Tavistock Lectures. In The Symbolic Life. Moscow: Cogito Center. (In Russian).

Jünger, F. (2002). The Perfection of Technology. Machine and Property. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. (In Russian).

Kant, I. (1994). Critique of Judgement. Moscow: Art. (In Russian).

МcDonald, R. (2006). The Cambridge Introduction to Samuel Beckett. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1992). Eye and Mind. Moscow: Art. (In Russian).

Mulhall, S. (2001). On Film, London: Routletge.

Pascal, B. (1994). Thoughts. Moscow: REFL-book. (In Russian).

Plothast, U. (2008). The Metaphisical Vision. Arthur Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Art and Samuel Beckett’s Own Way to Make Use of It. New York: Peter Lang.

Saunders R. (2007). Lamentation and Modernity in Literature, Philosophy and Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

Schopenhauer, A. (2001). New Paralipomena. In The Collected Works in 6 volumes. V. 5. Moscow: TERRA-Book Club; Republic. (In Russian).

Schopenhauer, A (1993a). The World as Will and Representation. In On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. The World as Will and Representation. Vol. 1. Critique of the Kantian Philosophy. Moscow: Science (In Russian).

Schopenhauer, A. (1993b). The world as will and representation. In On the Will in Nature. The World as Will and Representation. T.2. Moscow: Science. (In Russian).

Tonning, E. (2015). «I am not reading philosophy»: Beckett and Schopenhauer. In Beckett/Philosophy (pp. 75-102). Stuttgard: ibidem-Verlag.

Tucker, Y. (2017). Starry Speculative Corpse (Horror of Philosophy, Volume II). Perm: Hyle Press. (In Russian).

Weller, S. (2005). A Taste for a Negative. Beckett and Nihilism. Oxford: Modern Humanities Research Association and Maney Publishing.

Wittgenstein, L. The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. In Philosophical Works. Part I. Moscow: Gnosis. (In Russian).

Zizek, S. (2008). The Parallax View. Moscow: Europe. (In Russian).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.