Naked Feminine Physicality as an Invented Tradition in South Asian Popular Culture
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

South Asia British India India Pakistan Bangladesh Nationalism Modernization Femininity Female Body Nudity Popular Culture Porn Cinema Beauty Pageants Consumption Invention of Traditions

How to Cite

Kyrchanoff, M. (2022). Naked Feminine Physicality as an Invented Tradition in South Asian Popular Culture. Corpus Mundi, 3(1), 73-122. https://doi.org/10.46539/cmj.v3i1.61

Abstract

The author analyses the problems of changes in the representation of the body and the metamorphosis of corporality in South Asia in colonial and postcolonial contexts. Methodologically, the author uses the ideas proposed in interdisciplinary studies of nationalism, combining them with the achievements of the visual turn. It is assumed that, on the one hand, the cultures of the region were able to form their own unique traditions of perceiving naked feminine corporality. On the other hand, the article shows how British colonialism changed these ideas, promoting a moderate Westernisation of cultural spaces, including the idea of ​​naked feminine corporality. The author analyses the role of Hinduism as one of the factors that significantly influenced the development of ideas about corporality. The author analyses the problems of mass culture as the main space for the disclosure of images of the body and physicality in the modern consumer society. The article analyses the role of “high” and “low” culture in the development of collective ideas about the body. The author analyses how the perception of nudity changed under the conditions of post-colonialism in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. It is assumed that the Indian model of the imagination of corporality and its perception in the discourses of mass culture claims the status of a universal paradigm that significantly affects the perception of corporality in the cultures of neighbouring states. The author analyses how intellectuals used forms of physicality in their attempts to visualise ethnic and cultural identities, emphasising and actualising, on the one hand, the differences of their own ethnicities from the identities of neighbouring nations. On the other hand, the author believes this trend is archaic, transitional and temporary, since the modern mass cultures of South Asia tend to assimilate local cultural and ethnic traditions. Therefore, the article shows that traditional ethnicity in visualisation of body turned into one more strategy used for attracting attention. The author analyses some cultural phenomena as invented traditions of mass culture. Therefore, spaces and forms of visualisation and actualisation of naked feminine corporality, including films, posters, comics, beauty contests are perceived as a visual type of invented traditions that legitimise the identity of the consumer society and mass culture.

https://doi.org/10.46539/cmj.v3i1.61
pdf (Русский)

References

Adel, G. A. H. (1981). Farhang-e berehnegi-yo berehnegi-ye farhangi [Culture—and nudity—and cultural nudity]. Soroush. (In Farsi).

Banerji, D. (2010). The Alternate Nation of Abanindranath Tagore. SAGE Publisher. https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132104858

Barthes, R. (1980). La chambre claire. Note sur la photographie [The clear room. Note on photography]. Gallimard. (In French).

Benjamin, V. (2013). The Work of Art in the Age of Technical Reproducibility. In A brief history of photography (pp. 60–113). Ad Marginem. (In Russian).

Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. Penguin Books.

Bruck, J., & Docker, J. (1989). Puritanic rationalism: John Berger’s ways of seeing and media and culture studies. Continuum: The Australian Journal of Media and Culture, 2(2), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304318909359365

Doss, F. (2013). How History is Written Today: A French Perspective. In G. Garrett, G. Dufault, & L. Pimenov (Eds.), How We Write History (pp. 9–56). ROSSPEN. (In Russian).

Eshelman, R. (2020). Notes on Performance Photography: Cognition of Beauty and Transcendence after Postmodernism. In R. Acker, E. Gibbons, & T. Vermeulen (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth After Postmodernism (pp. 286–307). Ripol Classic. (In Russian).

Ewen, S. (1976). Captains of Consciousness: Advertising and the Social Roots of the Consumer Culture. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.3817/0976029207

Ewen, S. (1988). All Consuming Images: The Politics of Style in Contemporary Culture. Basic Books.

Freitag, S. B. (2014). The visual turn: Approaching south asia across the disciplines. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 37(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2014.930012

Frembgen, J. W., & Jehangir, A. (2018). Dirty Pictures. Vulgar Street Art in Lahore, Pakistan. In C. Kruse, B. Meyer, & A.-M. Korte (Eds.), Taking Offense: Religion, Art, and Visual Culture in Plural Configurations (pp. 267–283). Brill Fink. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846763452_012

Fuery, P., & Fuery, K. (2003). Visual Cultures and Critical Theory. Hodder Arnold Publications.

Glushkova, N. (2014). The Minefield of Insulted Hinduism: Undermining and Maiming. Domestic Notes, 6. https://strana-oz.ru/2014/6/minnoe-pole-oskorblennogo-induizma-podryvy-i-uvechya (In Russian).

Groys, B. (2006). Topology of Contemporary Art. Moscow Art Magazine, 61/62. http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/36/article/696 (In Russian).

Guha-Thakurta, T. (1992). The making of a new “Indian” art: Artists, aesthetics, and nationalism in Bengal, 1850 – 1920. Cambridge University Press.

Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press.

Jain, K. (2007). Gods in the bazaar: The economies of Indian calendar art. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1131bjr

Kamran, S. P. (2021). Exploring Female Identity in and Through Art in Pakistan: Experiencing De-Colonial Feminism. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 22(3), 132–141.

Kobrin, K., & Uvarov, P. (2007). Historians still have freedom. In any case, there is something to run away from. In Kirill Kobrin's conversation with Pavel Uvarov. Untouchable Stock: Debates on Politics and Culture (55). http://www.polit.ru/research/2008/01/30/uvarov.html (In Russian).

Krom, M. (2013). The Use of Concepts in Research on the History of Pre-Petrine Russia: A Change of Milestones and New Landmarks. In G. Garrett, G. Dufault, & L. Pimenov (Eds.), How We Write History (pp. 94–125). ROSSPEN. (In Russian).

Life, A. (2001). Picture Postcards by M.V. Dhurandhar: Scenes and Types of India—With a Difference. Visual Resources, 17(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2001.9658605

Menon, K. (2009). Everyday Nationalism: Women of the Hindu Right in India: The Ethnography of Political Violence. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202793

Mitchell, L. (2014). The Visual Turn in Political Anthropology and the Mediation of Political Practice in Contemporary India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 37(3), 515–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2014.937372

Mitter, P. (1994). Art and Nationalism in Colonial India, 1850 – 1922: Occidental Orientations. Cambridge University Press.

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6

Pinney, Ch. (2004). Photos of the Gods: The printed image and political struggle in India. Reaktion Books.

Sontag, S. (1966). Against Interpretation. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Sontag, S. (1977). On Photography. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.