Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The public demands of information will increase during the crisis and the social media accounts run by governmental sectors is one of the major sources where the public obtains information. This study focuses on the practices of Beijing health commission, an authoritative official outlet, in posting COVID-19 related information from a governmental stance. We explore the content of these social media posts and manner of posting during the COVID-19 crisis. Based on a data set of 1,422 Weibo posts related to the early 2022 COVID-19 wave in Beijing, we identified the theme of reports of confirmed cases and travel paths, and propagandistic objective as the most prominent. From analysed posts and the identified themes, the preliminary findings suggested that the government gave its priority to maintain its legitimacy during the crisis. Thus, by borrowing the concept of paternalism, we argued that arising the public’s attention of crisis is what government applied to achieve its propaganda goal, which aims to practicing its paternalistic governance in China.
References
Anand, D. (2018). Colonization with Chinese characteristics: Politics of (in)security in Xinjiang and Tibet. Central Asian Survey, 38, 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2018.1534801
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
Braithwaite, J., Coglianese, C., & Levi-Faur, D. (2007). Can regulation and governance make a difference? Regulation and Governance, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00006.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Büscher, M., Kerasidou, X., Petersen, K., & Oliphant, R. (2017). Networked urbanism and disaster. In M. Freudendal-Petersen & S. Kesselring (Eds.), Networked Urban Mobilities (pp. 59–79). Springer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315201078-5
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
Coombs, W. T. (2014). Applied Crisis Communication and Crisis Management: Cases and Exercises. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544308531
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/089331802237233
DeGennaro, T. (2019). The 10 most popular social media sites in China 2019 update. 1BC. https://www.dragonsocial.net/blog/social-media-in-china/
González-Herrero, A., & Smith, S. (2008). Crisis communications management on the web: How Internet-based technologies are changing the way public relations professionals handle business crises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00543.x
Hootsuite and We are Social. (2020). https://bit.ly/2QTzvxr
Hughes, A. L., & Palen, L. (2012). The evolving role of the public information officer: An examination of social media in emergency management. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/1547-7355.1976
Jia, H. (2022). More engagement but less participation: China’s alternative approach to public communication of science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, 31(3), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221090729
Le Grand, J., & New, B. (2015). Government paternalism: Nanny state or helpful friend. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691164373.001.0001
Liu, B. F., Fraustino, J. D., & Jin, Y. (2016). Social media use during disasters: How information form and source influence intended behavioral responses. Communication Research, 43(5), 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565917
Liu B.F., Jin Y., Austin L.L., & Janoske M. (2012). The social-mediated crisis communication model: Guidelines for effective crisis management in a changing media landscape. In S. C. Duhe (Ed.), New media and public relations (2nd ed.) (pp. 257–266). Peter Lang.
Lu, H., Chu, H., & Ma, Y. (2021). Experience, experts, statistics, or just science? Predictors and consequences of reliance on different evidence types during the COVID-19 infodemic. Public Understanding of Science, 30(5), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211009685
Macnamara, J. (2021). New insights into crisis communication from an “inside” emic perspective during COVID-19. Public Relations Inquiry, 10(2), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X21999972
Qu, Y., Huang, C., Zhang, P., & Zhang, J. (2011). Microblogging after a major disaster in China: A case study of the 2010 Yushu earthquake. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 25–34). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958830
Renwick, N. (2017). China’s approach to disaster risk reduction: Human security challenges in a time of climate change. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 4(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797016689207
Romenti, S., Murtarelli, G., & Valentini, C. (2014). Organizations’ conversations in social media: Applying dialogue strategies in times of crises. Corporate Communications an International Journal, 19(1), 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2012-0041
Rozenas, A., & Stukal, D. (2019). How autocrats manipulate economic news: Evidence from Russia’s state-controlled television. The Journal of Politics, 81(3), 982–996. https://doi.org/10.1086/703208
Schultz, F., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Oegema, D., Utz, S., & van Atteveldt, W. (2012). Strategic framing in the BP crisis: A semantic network analysis of associative frames. Public Relations Review, 38, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.003
Schultz, F., Utz, S., & Göritz, A. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 37, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001
Schultz, F., Utz, S., & Göritz, A. (2012). Crisis communication and social media. On the effects of medium, media credibility, crisis type and emotions. Paper presented at the Etmaal conference Leuven, Belgium.
SinaTech. (2020). 微博月活跃用户达5.16亿 竞争壁垒依旧稳固 [Weibo monthly active users reach 516 million, competition barriers remain stable]. SinaTech. https://tech.sina.com.cn/i/2020-02-26/doc-iimxxstf4598954.shtml
Stephens, K. K., & Malone, P. C. (2009). If the Organizations Won’t Give Us Information…: The Use of Multiple New Media for Crisis Technical Translation and Dialogue. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802557605
Wang, Q. (2018). Does the Chinese government engage in online public debates? A case study of political communications around the building of an oil refinery in Kunming, China. Global Media and China, 3(3), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436418804274
Wang, T., & Liu, H. (2018). An emerging Asian model of governance and transnational knowledge transfer: An introduction. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2018.1477030
Zeng, J., Chan, C., & Fu, K. (2017). How social media construct ‘truth’ around crisis events: Weibo’s rumour management strategies after the 2015 Tianjin blasts. Policy and Internet, 9(3), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.155
Zhang, Z. (2022). Contesting legitimacy in China’s crisis communication: A framing analysis of reported social actors engaging in SARS and COVID-19. Chinese Journal of Communication, 15(2), 182‑204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2022.2049835
Zou, W., & Tang, L. (2021). What do we believe in? Rumors and processing strategies during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Public Understanding of Science, 30(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520979459
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.